Rage Bait: A Strategic Tool or a Risky Gamble for Equestrian Brands?
Rage bait is one of the most divisive tactics in the modern marketing landscape. It involves intentionally creating content designed to provoke outrage, frustration, or irritation in order to trigger high engagement and algorithmic amplification. This can be achieved through deliberate misspellings, mispronunciations, controversial statements, or visually jarring imagery. The goal is simple: provoke a reaction strong enough to drive comments, shares, and debate.
Over the past two years, rage bait has moved beyond fringe internet humour to become a conscious strategy for content creators across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. According to a 2023 Sprout Social Index, content that triggers high-arousal emotions, anger included, can receive up to 75% more comments and shares than neutral posts. For influencers, this metric is enticing; for brands, it’s a calculated gamble. While rage bait can boost visibility and follower growth, it is increasingly raising questions about ethical boundaries, audience quality, and long-term brand impact, especially in industries, like equestrianism, where credibility and trust are critical.
What is Rage Bait and Why is it Used?
Rage bait operates on a well-studied psychological principle: humans are more likely to respond to negative or emotionally charged stimuli than to neutral content. A 2022 New York University study on social media behaviour found that posts eliciting moral outrage were 20% more likely to be shared than neutral ones. Algorithms amplify this effect, platforms reward engagement regardless of sentiment, meaning even angry comments help push a post to more feeds.
For creators chasing virality, the advantages are obvious: broader reach, rapid follower increases, and heightened brand recognition. Some sports-adjacent brands have used rage bait to tap into debates around controversial refereeing decisions or divisive training techniques, creating “buzz” around their channels.
In the equestrian world, rage bait often leans on insider cues, such as deliberately clashing colour-coordinated sets, mismatched tack combinations (like a dressage pad on a jumping saddle), or wearing a helmet without hair neatly tied back. These “mistakes” are subtle enough to invite correction or criticism but obvious to seasoned equestrians, creating a perfect environment for heated comment threads. The strategy works in driving conversation, but without careful framing, it risks alienating core followers who expect authenticity and expertise from equestrian-related accounts.
The Ethical Dilemma for Equestrian Brands
While some industries embrace provocation as part of their culture, fashion and beauty often being prime examples, the equestrian sector operates under a different set of expectations. Horse welfare, safety, and tradition are non-negotiable pillars for the majority of the community. This makes rage bait a higher-risk tactic.
A 2023 YouGov poll on trust in sports brands showed that 68% of equestrian consumers rank “demonstrating ethical responsibility” as a top factor in their purchasing decisions. Unlike a sneaker brand that can bounce back from a controversial ad with a celebrity, an equestrian brand that appears to trivialise safety or welfare can face reputational damage that lingers for years.
Consider the 2021 Tokyo Olympics modern pentathlon controversy, where footage of a distressed horse being mishandled went viral. Public reaction was swift and severe, multiple sponsors faced pressure to clarify their positions, and the governing body announced rule changes within months. This is a stark example of how imagery perceived as irresponsible can spread globally, fuel outrage, and force rapid institutional and commercial responses.
Even seemingly small acts, like a staged “funny” tack error, can undermine consumer trust. In tight-knit equestrian communities, word travels fast, and reputational hits can be magnified by peer networks where credibility is currency. Brands must weigh whether a fleeting spike in engagement is worth jeopardising their long-term standing in a sport where integrity is central to identity.
Does Rage Bait Convert or Merely Entertain?
The key question for any marketing strategy is whether it drives meaningful business outcomes. While rage bait can inflate vanity metrics like views, likes, and follower counts, there’s evidence it rarely leads to deeper engagement or conversions. HubSpot’s 2024 State of Marketing Report notes that only 17% of marketers who used intentionally provocative content saw sustained traffic growth three months post-campaign.
In sport, examples abound where viral moments brought visibility but no tangible commercial uplift. During the 2022 FIFA World Cup, several brand tweets designed to stir outrage went viral, but subsequent sales data showed no measurable increase in product demand. Without a strategic pathway from attention to action, rage bait risks becoming noise that fails to support core KPIs like lead generation, sales, or loyalty.
In equestrianism, the stakes are even higher because the audience is often more niche, values-driven, and community-oriented. A viral video of a “ridiculous” matchy-matchy set might reach hundreds of thousands of people, but if the majority are not potential customers, and worse, if loyal followers are turned off by the stunt, the net result can be negative. Engagement that doesn’t align with brand objectives is at best a missed opportunity, and at worst, a step backwards in brand positioning.
Should Equestrian Businesses Use Rage Bait?
For brands whose identities are rooted in humour, boldness, and irreverence, rage bait may be an on-brand tool when used sparingly and strategically. In such cases, it should be paired with clear context, either through captions, disclaimers, or follow-up educational content, to ensure audiences understand the intent.
However, for the majority of equestrian businesses, particularly those built around education, safety, or welfare, the risks outweigh the benefits. Data from the 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer indicates that 62% of consumers will stop buying from a brand they perceive as unethical, even if they previously liked its products. The potential for misinterpretation and the speed at which outrage can escalate online makes rage bait a gamble that most cannot afford to take.
That said, brands that are consistent with their tone of voice, actively present in their communities, and known for excellent customer service have a greater ability to engage in topical discussions or ride the wave of trends, even those with an element of provocation, without losing audience trust. When a business has cultivated a strong relationship with its audience and proven reliability over time, its followers are more likely to interpret content in the spirit it was intended and give the brand the benefit of the doubt. This goodwill acts as a buffer, allowing more creative or boundary-pushing campaigns to succeed without triggering backlash.
This doesn’t mean brands must avoid all controversy. Challenging outdated norms or advocating for positive change can generate debate while strengthening brand equity. The difference lies in whether the content advances a constructive conversation or merely stirs conflict for clicks. In equestrianism, the most effective virality often comes from authentic storytelling, behind-the-scenes transparency, and educational campaigns that inspire as much as they inform.
The Role of PR and Crisis Management in a Marketing Strategy
In today's digital environment, where content can go viral in minutes, a robust public relations (PR) function is essential. For equestrian businesses rooted in trust, ethics, and welfare, PR plays both a proactive and reactive role: guiding value-aligned marketing while providing a structured response when controversy arises.
Crisis management is now inseparable from the realities of a 24/7 online conversation. In sport, measurable data underscores how timing and transparency influence recovery. The Orlando Magic found that their social media crisis response effectiveness declined by approximately 35% for every hour of delay once a story gained traction, prompting a policy to issue an initial acknowledgement within 45 minutes. Similarly, the Dallas Cowboys use advanced social listening to monitor more than 75 keywords and detect emerging issues hours before they reach traditional press. Historical examples show the stakes: when Tiger Woods’s scandal broke in 2009, Nike suffered an estimated $1.7 million loss in sales and a drop of over 100,000 customers, while its 2018 Colin Kaepernick campaign, initially met with a 2.2% dip in stock price, drove a 27% surge in online orders, a testament to the power of aligned, deliberate messaging.
Social media has transformed crisis and reputation management from a controlled, newsroom-paced process into a real-time, high-visibility arena. It functions both as a risk amplifier and a recovery tool. On one hand, platforms accelerate the spread of negative narratives through shares, reposts, and trending hashtags. On the other, they offer brands direct access to audiences without media gatekeepers, enabling immediate correction of misinformation and humanising responses through tone, transparency, and visual storytelling.
Research on sports organisations shows that loyal fan bases can become active defenders during crises, challenging misinformation and reframing narratives when they believe the brand is acting authentically. However, this advocacy is conditional; it depends on pre-crisis trust and a track record of integrity. Social platforms also encourage two-way engagement during recovery periods, where listening to stakeholder concerns, responding with empathy, and demonstrating corrective action can accelerate reputation rebuilding.
Importantly, the speed and visibility of social media demand that PR strategies integrate seamlessly with a brand’s digital presence. This means having pre-approved response frameworks, clear tone-of-voice guidelines, and decision-making protocols that allow teams to act within minutes rather than days. In this way, social media is not just a channel for delivering PR, it is a parallel arena where the brand’s values, credibility, and resilience are tested in real time.
For equestrian businesses, where the scrutiny on welfare and safety is especially intense, this readiness is non-negotiable. The brands, athletes and organisations that endure aren’t those that avoid every stumble, but those that meet challenges with speed, transparency, and a steady commitment to their values.
Sources:
Edelman Trust Institute. 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report. Edelman. January 17, 2025.
HubSpot. The State of Marketing 2024. HubSpot. 2024.
New York University. Moral Outrage in Social Media Sharing: Experimental Evidence from Online Networks. NYU. 2022.
Orlando Magic. Social Media Crisis Response Effectiveness Study. Orlando Magic. 2023.
Dallas Cowboys Communications Team. Social Listening and Brand Monitoring Report. Dallas Cowboys. 2023.
Sprout Social. Sprout Social Index 2023: Social Media Benchmarks and Trends. Sprout Social. 2023.
YouGov. Consumer Trust in Sports Brands Survey. YouGov. 2023.
Chung, KYC. Economic Value of Celebrity Endorsement: Tiger Woods’ Impact on Nike Golf Balls. SSRN. 2013.
Carnegie Mellon University. Impact of Tiger Woods Scandal on Nike and Golf. PR Newswire. December 2, 2010.
University of California, Davis. Tiger Woods Scandal Cost Shareholders up to $12 Billion. UC Davis News. December 28, 2009.
Edison Trends. Nike Online Sales Surge 31% Days After Kaepernick Ad Released. KGW News. September 8, 2018.
Bloomberg. Nike Orders Rose in Four-Day Period After Kaepernick Ad Debut. Bloomberg. September 7, 2018.
MarketWatch. Nike’s Online Sales Jumped 31% After Company Unveiled Kaepernick Campaign. MarketWatch. September 17, 2018.
ResearchGate. Sports Fans as Crisis Communicators on Social Media Websites. ResearchGate. 2013.
MDPI. Social Media and Crisis Communication in Sport. MDPI. 2023.
Edelman Trust Institute. 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Report. Edelman. 2023.
Mid-South Horse Review. Credibility and Trust: Why Ethical Journalism Matters in Equine Journalism. Mid-South Horse Review. July 17, 2025.
